Intellectual Property Office
Non-Confidential Disclosures
“Image-based CAPTCHAs for Website Security”
PSU Invention Disclosure No. 3125 Download a PDF of this description
Field of the Invention/Key Words:
CAPTCHAs; Web security; Internet authentication or verification; automated Turing test, image retrieval
Links:
Inventor Website-1
Inventor Website-2
CAPTCHA
Inventors:
R. Datta, J. Wang and J. Li
Background:
Many Websites require an authentication process whereby a test is given to tell humans and computers apart
to help prevent automated use of the Website by computers. When a computer program is able to generate such
tests and evaluate the result, it is known as a CAPTCHA (Completely Automated Public test to Tell Computers
and Humans Apart). In the past, Websites have often been attacked by malicious programs that register on
a massive scale. Programs can be written to automatically consume large amounts of Web resources or bias
results in on-line voting. This has driven many Websites to the idea of CAPTCHA-based security to ensure
that such attacks are not possible without human intervention, which in turn makes them ineffective.
A CAPTCHA acts as a security mechanism by requiring a correct answer to a question which only a human can answer any better than a random guess. Most current CAPTCHAs are text-based and an example is shown to the right (Fig 2). Commercial CAPTCHAs play a significant role in enhancing the security and reliability of the World Wide Web. Some of these can be found while registering for a new Yahoo! Account or signing up for
PayPal. However, text-based CAPTCHAs have been broken using object-recognition techniques with high accuracies. This reduces the reliability of security protocols based on text based CAPTCHAs.
Invention description:
We have created a system for the generation of
attack-resistant,
user-friendly, image-based CAPTCHAs. We produce controlled distortions on randomly chosen images and present them to the user for annotation from a given list of words (Fig 1). The images are distorted in a way that prevents the chance of successfully using image understanding technologies such as content-based image retrieval. In a preferred implementation of our technology this selection is combined with the prior step of clicking near the center of any picture in a mosaic such as that shown to the right (Fig 3). This results in a two-round click-and-annotate process that makes the process both user friendly and very effective.
Contact:
Bradley A. Swope
Sr. Technology Licensing Officer
The Pennsylvania State University
113 Technology Center
University Park, PA 16802
Phone: (814) 863-5987
Fax: (814) 865-3591
E-mail: bradswope@psu.edu |