Office for Research Protections

Mentoring

Background
PSU Policies
PowerPoint Presentations
Case Studies
Online Learning Tools
Articles

Background

According to the American Psychological Association, "Mentoring responsibilities include sharing knowledge and skills, overseeing the trainee's work, helping the trainee to make contact with other researchers, and assisting with career counseling. The trainee reciprocates by providing work hours and a fresh perspective for the mentor, and taking a proactive role in learning, developing, and landing a job." (1)

Whether the term used is advisor, supervisor, trainer, mentor, or something else, relationships between graduate students and those with greater experience are extremely important in both education and professional development. In addition to assisting students with meeting graduate degree requirements, mentors introduce students to the standards of conduct within their profession, and model the responsible conduct of research and scholarship. Often students will interact with more than one mentor over the course of their graduate education, which can be beneficial to the student, but also challenging as each relationship may differ in style and purpose.

The relationship between a mentor and a trainee is complex, and may vary depending on the amount of time spent together, the nature of the research or scholarship, the amount of independence typically afforded to (or expected of) students in the field, and the personalities of the individuals involved. Mentors may assume that they do not need to be explicit about expectations, or that trainees will take the initiative in presenting research results or asking questions. Trainees may assume that a busy mentor doesn't want to be disturbed, or that a lack of feedback implies satisfactory (or perhaps unsatisfactory) performance. In addition, the pressures faced by both mentor and trainee, especially if working in a competitive field, can strain a relationship.

Avoiding ambiguity in expectations and roles can help maintain a professional working relationship that is beneficial to both parties. Many institutions now advocate that mentors and trainees agree on a set of written expectations, in the form of a "compact" or "development plan". Some guidelines that can be set at the beginning of the relationship include:

  • How much time the trainee is expected to spend on research
  • How much interaction the trainee can expect from the mentor, and what form that interaction will take
  • How responsibilities are shared or divided
  • How credit is assigned (for ideas, work, or publications)
  • Who owns data or results
  • When does the trainee become independent

Like any relationship, an ongoing collaboration between mentor and trainee requires attention and care. Free & open communication, trust, mutual respect, and honesty are key components. Both trainee and mentor have a responsibility to communicate concerns and questions before issues arise that cannot be resolved; likewise, both parties need to be receptive and respond promptly to situations that need attention or clarification.

References

  1. APA online, Mentoring (2008) American Psychological Association,
    http://www.apa.org/science/rcr/mentoring.html

PSU Policies

  • Guideline RAG16: The Responsible Conduct Of Research

    The Pennsylvania State University is committed to fostering integrity in the conduct of research. All members of the research community, including faculty, research staff, students, fellows, adjunct faculty, and visiting researchers, are expected to adhere to the highest ethical and professional standards as they pursue research activities to further scientific understanding.

    The goal of the Guidelines is to offer a set of values, principles, and standards to guide decision-making and conduct throughout the research process. It is not intended to provide a set of rules that prescribe how researchers should act in all situations. Rather, the Guidelines are intended to increase awareness of research integrity and outline the University's expectations for ethical behavior amongst all researchers.

    The Guidelines discussed are not mutually exclusive. There are many circumstances when many of them apply to a single project or activity. The risks of non-adherence to the Guidelines can be both personally and institutionally great. Potential consequences of non-adherence are outlined in the University polices that form the foundation for these Guidelines.

Resources

PowerPoint Presentations

Case Studies

Online Learning Tools

Articles

Access to select articles is provided free of charge by Penn State Libraries. To access these articles from a non-campus location, you must authenticate using the Penn State Virtual Private Network (VPN).