Personal tools
Document Actions

The king of retractions has "fallen off my throne"! Are retractions caused by fraud or honest error? The Diederik Stapel case

— filed under:

Speaker(s): Sharon Shriver - Assistant Director of Educational Programs, Office for research protections
When: Nov 21, 2013, 12:00 pm to 01:30 pm
Where: 102 Kern Graduate Building
Add to my calendar: vCal    iCal

At 53 retractions and counting, Diederik Stapel can count himself among the elite in terms of high retraction counts. Stapel has admitted to committing fraud: “The cookie jar was on the table without a lid,” he says. Stapel’s fraud was extensive, and affected students, colleagues, and his research field of psychology. Are most retractions caused by deliberate, hand-in-the-cookie-jar misconduct? Or is Stapel just an extreme case, and most retractions are due to honest error and an effective, self-correcting system? Recent studies have addressed these questions, and we’ll look into the motivations behind some known fraudsters as well as more innocent causes of retractions.

Preregistration is required!  Click here

For more information: