Appendices A, B and C

Word and Pdf versions of Appedix A ( IDP, Appendix B ( Performance Review), Appendix C ( Performance Improvement) are at the end of the page.

 

APPENDIX A

Individual Development Plan for Postdoctoral Scholars

A resource for postdocs and faculty at Penn State developed by the Office of Postdoctoral Affairs.

 

INFORMATION

 

Name of Postdoctoral Scholar:                                                                      

 

Department:                                                   

 

Starting Date of Postdoc : ______________________ 

 

Signature:                                                        Date:                          

 

PI:                                                                    

 

PI signature:                                        Date:                          

 

 

If more than one PI, include their name and signature also. Indicate which PI is evaluating performance and responsible for the hiring and renewal.

 

 

 

 

 

 

RESEARCH PROJECT INFORMATION

 

  1. List and describe the scientific aims or goals of research project(s). Identify if you are beginning a new project or a new inquiry or building on previous work in the group

 

Postdoc:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Faculty PI comments:

 

 

 

 

 

  1. List publication(s) associated with each project ( for 2nd year of IDP review)

Postdoc:

 

 

 

Faculty PI comments:

 

 

 

 

 

  1. List new methods developed or learned since last IDP or in this year OR

List the new methods that you plan to learn or use in your current research.

 

Postdoc:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Faculty PI comments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  1. Did you present your research at any conferences or meetings or do you plan to present at any upcoming meetings or conferences?

 

Postdoc:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Faculty PI comments

 

  1. Will there be any scope of any grant or fellowship application? OR List any (potential) grant applications?

 

Postdoc:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Faculty PI comments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  1. Teaching related opportunities if relevant (i.e. interested in teaching faculty or tenure track faculty position). Include Co-teaching, leading a Seminar series, Attending undergrad pedagogy seminars.

 

Postdoc:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Faculty PI comments:

 

 

 

 

  1. Mentoring undergrads or graduate students

Postdoc:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Faculty PI comments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  1. List goals in each of the categories of skills development or top 5 goals and their timeline.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Professional development opportunities 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

What are your short-term career goals? Describe your timeline for achieving them?

Short term goal

Anticipated timeline

Comments from PI

Postdoc’s comments

Other resources

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

You may use the information obtained from your skills, values and interests assessment exercises in Individual Development Plan workshop to articulate your goals.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

What are your long-term career goals? Describe your timeline for achieving them?

 

Long term goal

Anticipated timeline

Support from PI

Postdoc’s role

Other resources

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

What further research activity or other training is needed before it is appropriate to start a job search?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

When do you intend to begin a job search? ( Can be an estimate).

 

 

 

 

ADDITIONAL NOTES AND COMMENTS

 

Postdoc

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

PI:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

APPENDIX B

Office of Postdoctoral Affairs

Penn State University

Annual Postdoc Evaluation Form

I.

 

Name:                                                                                                 Department/Center

Date of appointment (in current lab):                                                 Select one: Scholar/Fellow

Date of review:

Faculty members and postdocs can discuss and add modify the annual evaluation form criteria specific to their research or lab/group.

II. Core criteria for evaluation

Criteria

Needs Improvement

 

Successful

 

Exceptional

Research

 

 

 

 

 

Publications

 

 

 

 

 

Presentation

 

 

 

 

 

Other

 

 

 

 

 

Comments

 

 

III. Factors related to performance

Scientific Knowledge

Needs Improvement

 

Successful

 

Exceptional

Broad knowledge base of science

 

 

 

 

 

Analytical Approach to defining scientific questions

 

 

 

 

 

Design of Scientifically Testable hypothesis

 

 

 

 

 

Comments

 

 

 

 

 

Research skills

 

 

 

 

 

Designing experiments

 

 

 

 

 

Data Analysis and Interpretation

 

 

 

 

 

Statistical analysis

 

 

 

 

 

Comments

 

 

 

 

 

Execution of Research

Needs Improvement

 

Successful

 

Exceptional

Efficiency of performing experiments

 

 

 

 

 

Productivity

 

 

 

 

 

Prioritization

 

 

 

 

 

Quality of work (accurate, thorough)

 

 

 

 

 

Other

 

 

 

 

 

Comments

 

 

 

 

 

                   

 

 

Communication

Needs Improvement

 

Successful

 

Exceptional

Writing skills

 

 

 

 

 

Basic Editing skills

 

 

 

 

 

E-mail communication

 

 

 

 

 

Presenting research/oral communication

 

 

 

 

 

Routine communication in day-to-day operations

 

 

 

 

 

Other

 

 

 

 

 

Comments

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interpersonal skills

Needs Improvement

 

Successful

 

Exceptional

Maintaining positive relationships with colleagues in the group

 

 

 

 

 

Understanding and demonstrating lab/group/workplace etiquette

 

 

 

 

 

Upholding commitments and deliverables

 

 

 

 

 

Other

 

 

 

 

 

Comments

 

 

Learning Skills

Needs Improvement

 

Successful

 

Exceptional

Seeks mentoring

 

 

 

 

 

Identifies gaps and creates learning plans

 

 

 

 

 

Participates in training/professional development/career development activities

 

 

 

 

 

Other

 

 

 

 

 

Comments

 

 

 

 

 

 

Overall evaluation

 

 

 

 

 

 

IV. Complete, acknowledge and sign as appropriate:

Dr. _______________________ has not been reappointed.

Dr._________________________ has been reappointed until _______________.

 

Acknowledgements:

My mentor and I have discussed the evaluations.

 

Signature of Postdoc: _____________                                                           Date: ________________________________

 

Signature of Faculty mentor: ______________________________

Date:_________________________________

 

 

APPENDIX C

PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT PLAN

 

Performance improvement plan/template letter when expectations of faculty PIs are not being met by the postdoc.

Faculty need to discuss with their respective college HR Strategic partners before implementing a Performance Improvement Plan

Letter needs to be on the letter head of the faculty member.

 

Dear Dr.___________

 

This letter shall serve to document the details of our meeting on ­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­______________ in which you were informed that your performance is not meeting my expectations.

I have evaluated your performance since you have joined my lab on ________________. I have conveyed my expectations to you in our meetings on _____ (dates)______ and emails on _______(dates). Specifically, you have not been able to demonstrate satisfactory performance in the areas of   _________________

 

 

 

 

As we discussed on (date)___________, I will provide you with a limited period of time to improve

your performance to a satisfactory level.  Over the next _____weeks/_______months, I will evaluate your performance closely. We will meet weekly to discuss your performance and your progress during this period with respect to the projects and goals listed below. It is my expectation that you will provide me with weekly written progress reports that will update me on your progress.

Your weekly progress reports should include experiments performed, data you have generated, ________________________________ and any other information in order to document that you are on track to satisfy the expectations and goals outlined below.